Is a Moral Construct an Opinion?

AUTHOR’S NOTE: I promised this platform would not become political, and I intend to keep that promise. The following is shared as a widely recognized example and solely for perspective.

This question is challenging; the answer can sometimes become unclear or insincere. It is remarkable how many people argue against the distinction between opinion and fact, often conflating the definitions of the two. What do we truly understand about moral constructs? They are concepts developed by individuals or societies to define and guide what is considered right or wrong, good or bad, in human behavior. These constructs are shaped by cultural, religious, philosophical, and social influences, serving as a foundation for ethical decision-making and interpersonal interactions.

A modern example of a moral construct is the United States Constitution, founded on core principles such as individual liberty, justice, and equality. On October 11, 1798, John Adams addressed the Massachusetts Militia, stating, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” Over time, however, the challenges and inadequacies of governance have contributed to a growing anti-morality movement in the United States. This division has enabled hypocrisy to infiltrate public discourse, undermining freedom of thought and shaping the dystopian reality we seem to be grappling with today.

Given this context, one might argue that morality has become subjective—a matter of opinion. Personally, I see it differently. Morality transcends opinion or fact; it is a principle rooted in our shared humanity. It requires far less effort to respect fundamental human rights and even less to treat others with decency and kindness.

So, I leave you with this: If you consider yourself a person of moral conviction, do your values align with the basic principles of humanity? Do they ensure that your actions do not harm the person beside you?